Posts Tagged ‘Parenting’

Mother could face jail because her children talked to each other on Facebook – Telegraph


This case would make headlines across the land, if it were not hidden behind the family courts’ extraordinary wall of secrecy.

Mother could face jail because her children talked to each other on Facebook – Telegraph.

Courtesy Christopher Booker via The Telegraph

Parliamentary Bill – #wco Parenting (Young Offenders (Parental Responsibility) Bill 2010-11)


Hollobone, Philip raised and interesting point.

Subject(s): Parenting; Education; Justice

A Bill to make provision for a mechanism to hold individuals to account for any criminal sanctions imposed upon young people for whom those individuals hold parental responsibility; and for connected purposes.

Comment by #wco: Not forgetting there should be weighting in this responsibility heavily towards the Main Carer or Parent with Care.

Other contacts:

More information can be seen at:

Published: 05/07/2010 18:10:00

Parliamentary Bill – #wco Parenting (Kinship Carers (Parental Responsibility Agreements) Bill 2010-11)


McCarthy, Kerry raised and interesting point.

Subject(s): Parenting; Childcare; Family Courts; NRP Rights; Regulation; Parenting

A Bill to require the Secretary of State to make provision to extend the system of parental responsibility agreements to enable a kinship carer to obtain parental responsibility for a child they are raising without having to bring a case to court; and for connected purposes

Comment by #wco:

Other contacts:

More information can be seen at:

Published: 07/06/2011 17:10:00

News & Information – #wco Parenting (Open Family Services)


Harvey, Anna raised and interesting point.

Subject(s): Parenting;

OpenFamilyServices is the national online directory of accredited family services, information, registered child care and positive activities. The information comes directly from participating Local Authorities across England who verify the information to ensure it’s accuracy. Information about national services is also available in a single search.

Comment by #wco:

Other contacts:

More information can be seen at:

Published: 25/10/2011 17:45:00

Child Maintenance oral evidence to Work and Pensions Committee


Work and Pensions Committee

Select Committee Announcement

09 June 2011

For Immediate Release: AN42 2010–12


Child Maintenance


Wednesday 15 June 2011, Grimond Room, Portcullis House at 9.45am

Maria Miller MP, Minister for Disabled People, Department for Work and Pensions

Dame Janet Paraskeva, Chair, Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission

Noel Shanahan, new Commissioner and CEO, Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission

The Work and Pensions Committee is conducting an inquiry into the proposed reforms of the child maintenance system.

The Green Paper ‘Strengthening families, promoting parental responsibility’ sets out the Government’s view that parents should be encouraged and supported to make their own arrangements for the maintenance of their children, before deciding to use the statutory maintenance scheme. The proposals include introducing charges for parents who use the statutory child maintenance service.

This is the second and final evidence session for this inquiry. The Committee will ask the Minister about the likely impact of the proposed reforms, including the impact on poorer and more vulnerable families. The Committee will also consider the availability of support services for separating parents and the proposal to close existing Child Support Agency cases.

The Terms of Reference for this inquiry can be found on the Committee’s website:

Further information

Committee membership: Dame Anne Begg MP (Chair) (Lab, Aberdeen South), Harriett Baldwin MP (Con, West Worcestershire), Andrew Bingham MP (Con, High Peak), Karen Bradley MP (Con, Staffordshire Moorlands), Alex Cunningham MP (Lab, Stockton North), Kate Green MP (Lab, Stretford and Urmston), Mr Oliver Heald MP (Con, North East Hertfordshire), Glenda Jackson MP (Lab, Hampstead and Highgate), Brandon Lewis MP, (Con, Great Yarmouth), Stephen Lloyd MP (Lib Dem, Eastbourne), Teresa Pearce MP (Lab, Erith and Thamesmead)

Specific Committee Information: 020 7219 2839

Media Information: 020 7219 0724

Committee Website:

Watch committees and parliamentary debates online:

Publications/Reports/Reference Material: Copies of all select committee reports are available from the Parliamentary Bookshop (12 Bridge St, Westminster, 020 7219 3890) or the Stationery Office (0845 7023474). Committee reports, press releases, evidence transcripts, Bills; research papers, a directory of MPs, plus Hansard (from 8am daily) and much more, can be found on

Open letter to the Work and Pensions Committee reviewing Child Maintenance


Good afternoon

I have been reading the written submissions and watching the hearings via Parliament website with interest.

The™ Charitable Organisation (#wco) provides practical information, support and assistance to Non-Resident Parents (NRP) that have lost contact with their children because the Parent with Care (PwC) has arbitrarily decided to stop access or the “authorities” are not fulfilling their duty of care to the child and for both parents.

We believe that Child Maintenance and Contact are both part of a bigger picture that should be taken into account where parents do not live together, for whatever reason.

I was pleased that Dame Anne Begg raised the issue that within her own constituency surgeries a significant number of NRP’s are forced into paying maintenance through the CSA/CMEC route but have no recourse to enforce Court Orders or contact arrangements that may be in force.  As you can appreciate, this is a major issue for NRP’s.

Looking at the submissions, I see CM02 from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group indicates there may be problems relying on the HMRC data.  We’d like to point out that there are some simple ways to alleviate this fear:

  • place more responsibility on the tax payer to ensure their information is correct and up to date
  • effective transparency and sharing of fiscal data between central and local government, and where appropriate the banking sector
  • use HMRC as the gateway to a persons fiscal data, perhaps providing an “end of year” statement showing tax/ni collected, benefits received (including local government) etc thereby providing a “single version of the truth”
  • ensure improved collection rates of Child Maintenance (and fines) by always having this collected using the soon to be HMRC Real Time Information system

 Dr CM Davies, within CM03, provides good examples of where the current system of calculation does not take into account the circumstances of the NRP and therefore causes great hardship and distress.  In addition, an NRP needs to provide adequate accommodation to their child(ren) and the “system” needs to take this into account – including that additional bedrooms may be needed.  Adrienne Burgess made a good point that the “system” should treat NRP’s as a Family where they have 14% of residence.  This would ensure the NRP gets all the systematic support that is currently only afforded to the PWC – including lower cost social housing and other passport benefits.

Ms Burgess also made a valid point that the way maintenance calculations are performed currently precludes benefit payments, however were the parents living together their joint income would be used.  In addition, there are basic living expenses that should be taken into account, eg housing costs and travel to work etc .. without this, the NRP simply would not be able to afford to pay the maintenance imposed and therefore creates arrears that simply cannot be realistically paid.

Overall, I am pleased the issue of Child Maintenance is being reviewed although disappointed that it has taken so long.  We agree that both parents should shoulder responsibility for their children, and this includes fair access to the child(ren) and fair payment by both.

This is a complicated issue; however, I strongly believe that Child Maintenance should not have its own agency.  The payments issue should be resolved via mediation & subsequent court approval – taking into account all circumstances of both parents.  The concept of shared or co-parenting should be enshrined in law, with all the support that this should afford being mandated to be provided by the relevant agencies and bodies.

Perhaps the committee should encourage the interaction on this subject between Sir Alan Beith of the Justice Committee, Rt Hon Iain Duncan Smith of the Social Justice Committee, Graham Stuart of the Education Committee, Rt Hon David Cameron of the Childhood and Families Taskforce and David Norgrove of the Family Justice Review Panel.  Not forgetting to take into account the valuable work of Rt Hon Frank Field and the Review on Poverty and Life Chances.

As a final comment, where parents do not live together, the PWC should not have a significant improvement in living standards at the expense of the NRP.  Their living standards should reflect their own income bracket.  If the parents could not afford to look after a child together – they should not be having a child!

May I congratulate you on your work and wish you well in your endeavours.

Parliamentary Debate – #wco Parenting (House of Lords: Children: Parenting – Question)


Northbourne, Christopher raised and interesting point.

Subject(s): Parenting; Childcare; Education; Parliament-UK

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they have any plans to define more clearly the responsibilities of parenthood. …

Comment by #wco: Parents are the people that are responsible for, and should enjoy, their children. Jointly and Equally.

Other contacts: Hill, Jonathan

More information can be seen at:

Published: 19/05/2011 11:05:00

Gov Written Answer – #wco Parenting (Education: Parenting Classes)


Ruane, Chris raised and interesting point.

Subject(s): Parenting; Childcare; Education; Parenting

To ask the Secretary of State for Education what assessment his Department has made of the effectiveness of (a) pre-natal classes and (b) adult parenting classes in improving child development.

Comment by #wco:

Other contacts: Teather, Sarah

More information can be seen at:

Published: 05/04/2011 12:00:00

Gov Written Answer – #wco Parenting (Health: Parenting Classes: Prenatal Classes)


Ruane, Chris raised and interesting point.

Subject(s): Parenting; Childcare; Education; Healthcare; SocialWorkers

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what proportion of local authorities offer (a) parenting classes and (b) pre-natal classes which are free at the point of use.

Comment by #wco:

Other contacts: Milton, Anne

More information can be seen at:

Published: 24/03/2011 12:00:00

Gov Written Answer – #wco Parenting (Education: Parenting Classes)


Ruane, Chris raised and interesting point.

Subject(s): Parenting; Childcare; Education; Healthcare; SocialWorkers

To ask the Secretary of State for Education

(1) what steps he is taking to deliver parenting classes within the school curriculum;

(2) whether he has made an estimate of the number of schools which offer parenting classes to their pupils.

Comment by #wco: All parents-to-be should be made to attend parenting classes.

We should be including the same level of Parenting Class and care requirements to expecting parents as is afforded to and required by Foster Carers.

Only by education will society understand that having a child is not a passport to a new home or a lifestyle choice. In addition, with mandatory parenting classes, their children should be better cared for and a better understanding of the commitment, time and expense required to look after a child.

Other contacts: Gibb, Nick

More information can be seen at:

Published: 24/03/2011 12:00:00

%d bloggers like this: